Reproduction in the Context of Human Deconstruction
Aleksandar Ljubic, Asim Kurjak, Milan Stanojevic, Frank A Chervenak, Dajana Švraka Milutinović
Keywords :
Artificial intelligence, Assisted reproductive techniques, Bioethical issues, Genetic engineering, Personal identity, Social change
Citation Information :
Ljubic A, Kurjak A, Stanojevic M, Chervenak FA, Milutinović DŠ. Reproduction in the Context of Human Deconstruction. 2025; 4 (1):1-6.
This article explores the profound transformations in modern society that are reshaping human identity, family structures, and intellectual engagement, with a particular focus on reproductive technologies. The concept of identity is increasingly fluid, influenced by digital connectivity and the rise of virtual communities. Meanwhile, the traditional family structure is being deconstructed due to broader societal changes toward individual autonomy and diversity, along with advancements in in vitro fertilization (IVF), surrogacy, and artificial reproductive technologies. The article also addresses the intellectual impoverishment in contemporary society, attributed to the digital age's impact on education and media consumption, raising concerns about society's capacity to engage with complex ethical and social issues. Additionally, it examines the new era of artificial gametes, embryos, artificial wombs, artificial intelligence (AI) patients, and AI babies, which challenge traditional views on conception and parenthood, necessitating a reevaluation of legal, ethical, and social frameworks. Finally, the implications of biohacking and genetic modification are considered, highlighting the ethical dilemmas and societal challenges posed by these advancements. The article underscores the importance of balancing technological innovation with ethical considerations to ensure that these advancements enhance human well-being while respecting individual autonomy and diversity.
Tuan Y-F. Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. 1977.
Relph E. Place and Placelessness. 1976.
Williams Institute. LGBTQ and Non-Binary Statistics. Available at: Williams Institute.
Statista. Gender Identity Worldwide. Available at: Statista.
Flusser V. Towards a Philosophy of Photography. 1983.
Spizzirri G, Eufrásio R, Lima MCP, et al. Proportion of people identified as transgender and non-binary gender in Brazil. Sci Rep 2021;11:2240. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-81411-4
Badawy MK, Dadoo P, Grossmann K, et al. Gender-inclusive practice in pregnancy determination for transgender, gender diverse, and non-binary patients in medical imaging. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2023;67(6):625–633. DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13551
Kreines FM, Quinn GP, Cardamone S, et al. Training clinicians in culturally relevant care: a curriculum to improve knowledge and comfort with the transgender and gender diverse population. J Assist Reprod Genet 2022;39(12):2755–2766. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-022-02655-1
Lampe NM, Nowakowski ACH. New horizons in trans and non-binary health care: bridging identity affirmation with chronicity management in sexual and reproductive services. Int J Transgend Health 2021;22(1-2):141–153. DOI: 10.1080/26895269.2020.1829244
Norris M, Borneskog C. The cisnormative blindspot explained: healthcare experiences of trans men and non-binary persons and the accessibility to inclusive sexual & reproductive healthcare: an integrative review. Sex Reprod Healthc 2022;32:100733. DOI: 10.1016/j.srhc.2022.100733
Jung C, Hunter A, Saleh M, et al. Breaking the binary: how clinicians can ensure everyone receives high quality reproductive health services. Open Access J Contracept 2023;14:23–39. DOI: 10.2147/OAJC.S368621
Silva Lara LA, Navarro PAA, Reis ETS, et al. Reproductive aspects of transgenders. Hum Reprod Arch 2023. DOI: 10.4322/hra.000223
Choi JY, Kim TJ. Fertility preservation and reproductive potential in transgender and gender fluid population. Biomedicines 2022;10(9):2279. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10092279
Falck FAOK, Dhejne CMU, Frisén LMM, et al. Subjective experiences of pregnancy, delivery, and nursing in transgender men and non-binary individuals: a qualitative analysis of gender and mental health concerns. Arch Sex Behav 2024;53(5):1981–2002. DOI: 10.1007/s10508-023-02787-0
Greenfield M, Darwin Z. Trans and non-binary pregnancy, traumatic birth, and perinatal mental health: a scoping review. Int J Transgend Health 2021;22(1-2):203–216. DOI: 10.1080/26895269.2020.1841057
Kuhnt AK, Passet-Wittig J. Families formed through assisted reproductive technology: causes, experiences, and consequences in an international context. Reprod Biomed Soc Online 2022;14:289–296. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2022.01.001
Dworak E. New study reveals sharp decline in American IQ scores as the ’Reverse Flynn Effect’ takes center stage. Debrief 2023.
Zhang P-Y, Fan Y, Tan T, et al. Generation of artificial gamete and embryo from stem cells in reproductive medicine. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2020;8:781. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00781
Bulletti FM, Sciorio R, Palagiano A, et al. The artificial uterus: on the way to ectogenesis. Zygote 2023;31(5):457–467. DOI: 10.1017/S0967199423000175
Zhang S, Wang Y, Mao D, et al. Current trends of clinical trials involving CRISPR/Cas systems. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023;10:1292452. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1292452
Wright S. Biohacking queer and trans fertility: using social media to form communities of knowledge. J Med Humanit 2023;44(2):187–205. DOI: 10.1007/s10912-022-09776-9
Straiton J. Genetically modified humans: the X-Men of scientific research. Biotechniques 2019;66(6):249–252. DOI: 10.2144/btn-2019-0056
Liu X, Wu C, Lai R, et al. ChatGPT: when the artificial intelligence meets standardized patients in clinical training. J Transl Med 2023;21:447. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-023-04314-0
Raposo VL. The first Chinese edited babies: a leap of faith in science. JBRA Assist Reprod 2019;23(3):197–199. DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20190042
Karami N, Iravani F, Bakhshandeh Bavarsad S, et al. Comparing the advantages, disadvantages and diagnostic power of different non-invasive pre-implantation genetic testing: a literature review. Int J Reprod Biomed 2024;22(3):177–190. DOI: 10.18502/ijrm.v22i3.16161
Foulkes AL, Soda T, Farrell M, et al. Legal and ethical implications of CRISPR applications in psychiatry. North Carol Law Rev 2019;97(5):1359–1398.