Science, Art and Religion

Register      Login

VOLUME 1 , ISSUE 1 ( January-March, 2022 ) > List of Articles


Medical Ethics and Bioethics: New Challenges in Perinatal Medicine

Asim Kurjak

Keywords : Bioethics, Counseling, Embryo, Fetus, Medical ethics, Perinatal medicine

Citation Information : Kurjak A. Medical Ethics and Bioethics: New Challenges in Perinatal Medicine. 2022; 1 (1):17-24.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-11005-0003

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 06-05-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).


Ethics describes the study of the morality of physicians and patients, innovation and research, and health policy and advocacy. Bioethics is the study of the morality of healthcare professionals, healthcare organizations, biomedical and clinical research, and healthcare policy, with the goal of improving bioethical morality. Like medical ethics, bioethics is not transcultural, transnational, or transreligious. Religious beliefs provide an important reference point for bioethics. Religious beliefs can be a major source of influence on the values of physicians. The obligation of the doctor to respect the integrity of the patient's religious values makes those values immune to criticism. This also helps to give meaning to the ethical principle of respect for autonomy. The law has been utilized prominently as the basis of bioethics which imposes serious limitations because it burdens bioethics unnecessarily by putting it at risk for being reactive. In addition, the law is incomplete and inconsistent. Now more than ever the fetus is a patient. Ethical dimensions of this clinical and ethical concept are explored.

  1. McCullough LB, Coverdale JH, Chervenak FA. Professional ethics in obstetrics and gynecology. New York: Cambridge University Press 2020.
  2. Baker RB, McCullough LB. What is the history of medical ethics: the cambridge world history of medical ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009:3–15.
  3. Jonsen A, Baker RB, McCullough LB. The discourses of bioethics in the United States. The Cambridge World History of Medical Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009:477–485. DOI: 10.1017/CHOL9780521888790.040
  4. Boyd K. The discourses of bioethics in the United Kingdom. In Baker RB, McCullough LB, eds. The Cambridge World History of Medical Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009:486–489.
  5. Baker RB, McCullough LB, eds. The Cambridge World History of Medical Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
  6. Jonsen AR. The birth of bioethics. Hastings Cent Rep 1993; 23(6):S1–S4.
  7. Reich W, Ed. Encyclopedia of Bioethics. Revised edition. Mac-Millan, New York 1995;5.
  8. Abel F. Bioética. Orígenes, Presente y Futuro. Institut Borja de Bioètica—Mapfre Medicina, Barcelona-Madrid 2001.
  9. Bopp J, ed. Restoring the Right to Life: The Human Life Amendment. Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University Press, 1984.
  10. Curran CE. Abortion: contemporary debate in philosophical and religion ethics. In: Reich WT, ed. Encyclopedia of Bioethics, Revised edition. Vol.5. Mac-Millan, New York 1995;5:17–26.
  11. Noonan JR JT. The morality of abortion. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1970.
  12. Tristram Engelhardt H, Jr. The Foundations of Bioethics and Secular Humanism. Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers, Lissa, 2000.
  13. Evans MI, Fletcher JC, Zador IE. Selective first-trimester termination in octuplet and quadruplet pregnancies: clinical and ethical issues. Obstet Gynecol 1988;71(3 Pt 1):289–296.
  14. Dunstan GR. The moral status of the human embryo: a tradition recalled. J Med Ethics 1984;10(1):38–42. DOI: 10.1136/jme.10.1.38
  15. McNaughton M. Ethics and reproduction. AJOG 1990;162: 879–882.
  16. Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. Does obstetric ethics have any role in the obstetrician's response to the abortion controversy? AJOG 1990;163(5 Pt 1):1425–1429. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(90)90600-c
  17. Elias S, Annas GJ. Perspectives on fetal surgery. AJOG 1987;145(7):807–812. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(83)90683-x
  18. Nelson LJ. Legal dimensions of maternal-fetal conflict. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1992;35(4):738–748. DOI: 10.1097/00003081-199212000-00006
  19. Berkowitz RL. Invasive studies during normal pregnancy. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1990;75(6):1041–1042.
  20. McCullough LB, Chervenak FA. Ethics in obstetrics and gynecology. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.
  21. Harrison MR, Golbus MS, Filly RA. The Unborn Patient. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1988.
  22. Liley AW. The fetus as a personality. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 1972;6(2):99–105. DOI: 10.3109/00048677209159688
  23. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics. Fetal therapy: ethical considerations. Pediatrics 1988;81(6):898–899.
  24. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee on Ethics. Patient Choice: Maternal-Fetal Conflict. Washington, DC, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 1987.
  25. Mahoney MJ. Fetal-maternal relationship. In Reich WT, ed. Encyclopedia of Bioethics. New York: Macmillan, 1978, pp 485–494.
  26. Fletcher JC. The fetus as patient: ethical issues. JAMA 1981;246(7):772–773.
  27. Pritchard JA, MacDonald PC, Gant NF. Williams Obstetrics, 17th ed. Norwalk: Appleton-Century-Crofts 1985.
  28. Shinn RL. The fetus as a patient: a philosophical and ethical perspective. In: Milunsk A, Annas GJ, eds. Genetic and the Law III. New York: Plenum Press, 1985.
  29. Murray TH. Moral obligations to the not-yet born: the fetus as a patient. Clin Perinatol 1987;14(2):313–328.
  30. Mahoney MJ. The fetus as patient. West J Med 1989;150(4): 517–540.
  31. Newton ER. The fetus as patient. Med Clin N Am 1980;73: 537–560.
  32. Walters L. Ethical issues in intrauterine diagnosis and therapy. Fetal Ther 1986;1:32–37. DOI: 10.1159/000262230
  33. Kurjak A, Chervenak FA. Donald school embryo as a person and as a patient. Jaypee Brothers, New Delhi, 2019.
  34. Chervenak FA, Kupesic Plavsic S, Kurjak A. The Fetus as a Patient: Current Perspectives, Jaypee Brothers, New Delhi, 2019.
  35. Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. An ethically based standard of care for fetal therapy. J Mat Fetal Investigation 1991;1:175–180.
  36. Edelstein J. The Hippocratic Oath: text, translation, and interpretation. In Temkin O, Temkin CI, eds. Ancient Medicine: Selected Papers of Ludwig Edelstein. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press 1967, pp 3–63.
  37. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.
  38. Beauchamp TL, McCullough LB. Medical Ethics: The Moral Responsibility of Physicians. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1984.
  39. Faden R, Beauchamp TI. History and Theory of Informed Consent. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.
  40. Ross WD. The Right and the Good. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1930.
  41. Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. Perinatal ethics: a practical method of analysis of obligations to mother and fetus. Obstet Gynecol 1985;66(3):442–446.
  42. Field DR, Gates EA, Creasy RK et al. Maternal brain death during pregnancy: medical and ethical issues. JAMA 1988;260(6):816–822.
  43. Engelhardt HT Jr. The Foundation of Bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.
  44. Strong C. Ethical conflicts between mother and fetus in obstetrics. Clin Perinatal 1987;14:313–28.
  45. Anderson G, Strong C. The premature breech: cesarean section or trial of labor? J Med Ethics 1988;14(1):18–24. DOI: 10.1136/jme.14.1.18
  46. Coughlan MJ. When did I begin? conception of the human individual in history, philosophy and science. Bioethics 1988;3(4):333–341. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1989.tb00350.x
  47. Strong C, Anderson G. The moral status of the near-term fetus. J Med Ethics 1989;15(1):25–27. DOI: 10.1136/jme.15.1.25
  48. Fleming L. The moral status of the fetus: a reappraisal. Bioethics 1987;1(1):15–34. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1987.tb00002.x
  49. Ruddick W, Wilcox W. Operating on the fetus. Hastings Cent Rep 1982;12(5):10–14.
  50. Elias S, Annas GJ. Reproductive Genetics and the Law. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, 1987.
  51. Hellegers AE. Fetal development. Theol Stud 1970;31(1):3–9.
  52. Noonan JT. A private choice: abortion in America in the seventies. The Free Press. New York, 1979.
  53. Bopp J. Human Life and Health Care Ethics. University Publications of America. Frederick, 1985.
  54. Callahan S, Callahan D. Abortion: understanding differences. Fam Plann Perspect 1984;16(5):219-221.
  55. Warnock M. Do human cells have rights? Bioethics 1987;1(1): 1–14. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1987.tb00001.x
  56. Hare RM. An ambiguity in Warnock. Bioethics 1987;1(2): 175–178. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1987.tb00026.x
  57. Fletcher JC. Ethics and trends in applied human genetics. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser 1983;19(5):143–158.
  58. Fletcher JC. Ethical considerations. In: Harrison MR, Golbus MS& Filly RA: The Unborn Patient. Grune & Stratton. New York, 1984, pp 159–170.
  59. Fost N, Chudwin D, Wikker D. The limited moral significance of fetal viability. Hastings Center Rep 1980;10(6):10–13.
  60. Mahowald M. Beyond abortion: refusal of cesarean section. Bioethics 1989;3(2):106–121. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1989.tb00332.x
  61. Hack M, Fanaroff AA. Outcomes of extremely-low-birth-weight infants between 1982 and 1988. N Engl J Med 1989;321(24):1642–1647. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198912143212405
  62. Whyte HE, Fitzhardinge PM, Shennan AT, et al. Extreme immaturity: outcome of 568 pregnancies of 23–26 weeks’ gestation. Obstet Gynecol 1993;82(1):1–7.
  63. Norman M, Hallberg B, Abrahamsson T, et al. Association between year of birth and 1-Year survival among extremely preterm infants in sweden during 2004–2007 and 2014–2016. JAMA 2019;321(12):1188–1199. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.2021
  64. Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. Clinical guides to preventing ethical conflicts between pregnant women and their physicians. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;162(2):303–307. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(90)90374-g
  65. Annas GJ. Protecting the liberty of pregnant patients. N Engl J Med 1988;316(19):1213–1214. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198705073161909
  66. Nelson LJ, Milliken N. Compelled medical treatment of pregnant women. Life, liberty, and law in conflict. J Am Med Assoc 1988;259(7):1060–1066.
  67. Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. Justified limits on refusing intervention. Hastings Cent Rep 1991;21(12):12–18.
  68. Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. The fetus as patient: implications for directive versus nondirective counseling for fetal benefit. Fetal Diagnostic Ther 1991;6(1–2):93–100. DOI: 10.1159/000263630
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.