Science, Art and Religion

Register      Login

VOLUME 4 , ISSUE 1 ( January-March, 2025 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Toward a Third Dimension of Belief or Lack Thereof: Ruminations on the Future of the Science–Religion Debate

Niq Ruud

Keywords : Agnosticism, Atheism, Belief systems, Determinism, Free will, Gnosticism, Science and religion, Theism

Citation Information : Ruud N. Toward a Third Dimension of Belief or Lack Thereof: Ruminations on the Future of the Science–Religion Debate. 2025; 4 (1):20-24.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-11005-0088

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 31-01-2025

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2025; The Author(s).


Abstract

This paper proposes an expanded three-dimensional model for understanding belief systems and an individual's posture toward knowledge with the addition of a spectrum housing determinism and free will. By combining these three dimensions, the framework allows for a more nuanced classification of belief or lack thereof, with eight resulting categories.


PDF Share
  1. Draper P. “Atheism and agnosticism.” In: Zalta EN, editor. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2022, sec. 1.
  2. Martin M. Atheism: A Philosophical Justification. Philadelphia: Temple University Press; 1990, pp. 463–464.
  3. Viney D. “Process theism.” In: Zalta E, editor. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2022, sec. 2.
  4. Collins R. “Contributions from the philosophy of science,” In: Clayton P, Simpson Z, editors. The Oxford Handbook of Science and Religion. Oxford University Press; 2006, pp. 328–334.
  5. Huxley TH. “Agnosticism: a symposium,” In: Watts C, editor. The Agnostic Annual. 1884, pp. 5–6.
  6. Russell B. The Basic Writings of Bertrand Russell. Routledge; 2009, p. 557.
  7. Wright NT, Bird M. The New Testament in Its World. SPCK; 2019, pp. 610–611.
  8. Dawkins R. The God Delusion. Houghton Mifflin; 2006, p. 50.
  9. While insignificant to this argument, I have elsewhere proposed that no one can be fully atheistic to the classical or traditional God; an entity who is all good, all powerful, and all knowing. This, however, could be important here as it leaves room for other types of largely non-Western interpretations of deity to be included, though when it comes to religious determinism below I utilize only Christian examples. See “The Impossibility of an Atheistic Posture toward the Classical God,” Spectrum (in press).
  10. O’Connor T. “Free will,” In: Zalta E, editor. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2022, sec. 1.1.
  11. Sapolsky R. Determined. Penguin; 2023, p. 240. Earlier examples include Sam Harris and Daniel Wegner.
  12. Laplace P. “Essai philosophique sur les probabilités,” In: Théorie analytique des probabilités (V Courcier, 1820). In: Truscott FW, Emory FL. A Philosophical Essay on Probabilities (Dover, 1951).
  13. Sapolsky, 254.
  14. Johnson P. A History of Christianity. Atheneum; 1976, p. 287. While both examples could be seen as compatibilist in nature, there is still a clear element of determination at play; particularly in universalism, even with scholars such as Ilaria Ramelli noting “the eventual restoration and salvation depends on Christ's sacrifice … but this does not contradict human free will” in A Larger Hope? Vol. 1 (Cascade, 2019), 57.
  15. Sapolsky, 267.
  16. Jersak B. Her Gates Will Never Be Shut. Wipf & Stock; 2009, p. 186.
  17. MacDonald G. The Evangelical Universalist, 2nd Ed. Cascade; 2012, p. 206.
  18. Sapolsky, 340, 378–381.
  19. Chisholm R. “Human freedom and the self,” In: Watson G. editor. Free Will. Oxford University Press; 2003, p. 34.
  20. For a fabulous survey on the matter see Mark Balaguer, Free Will. MIT Press, 2014.
  21. Dew J, Gould P. Philosophy. Baker, 2019, pp. 141–143.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.