REVIEW ARTICLE

https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-11005-0076
Science, Art and Religion
Volume 3 | Issue 3-4 | Year 2024

Achieving India’s National Security through Self-reliant Defense Industry


Wangchu Lama

Department of Peace and Conflict Studies and Management, Sikkim University, Gangtok, Sikkim, India

Corresponding Author: Wangchu Lama, Department of Peace and Conflict Studies and Management, Sikkim University, Gangtok, Sikkim, India, Phone: +91 8116129139, e-mail: wanglamachang@gmail.com

Received: 13 March 2024; Accepted: 20 April 2024; Published on: 17 July 2024

ABSTRACT

In the contemporary era, India has been challenged by various external threats, such as border confrontations, especially with China and Pakistan. Along with the external threats, India is also challenged by a gamut of internal threats, such as unemployment, poverty, lack of technological know-how, and ethnic clashes. Analyzing such situations, the Government of India has always been keen on exploring panacea to address both traditional and nontraditional threats to the nation. Self-reliance has been one of India’s major policies since the time of independence to secure the nation from various threats. Indo-Sino war has been an eye-opener for India, thus urging the nation to build a strong defense industrial base by enhancing indigenous defense production. In this context, making India self-reliant and self-sufficient, which have been the goals of previously initiated programs, could not achieve its desired goals, but how “Aatma Nirbhar Bharat Abhiyan” would augment and enhance the indigenization of defense manufacturing to address both traditional and nontraditional threats faced by India, is less explored. As a developing country that has perennial border skirmishes and geopolitical challenges, India has been heavily dependent upon foreign sources for military equipment and its supply. India’s various efforts to acquire military competency through indigenization programs have been hindered by various factors, especially global hegemonic politics that heavily relied on technological supremacy.

Keywords: Defense industry, Indigenous defense, National security, Security threats, Self-reliance

How to cite this article: Lama W. Achieving India’s National Security through Self-reliant Defense Industry. Sci Arts Relig 2024;3(3–4):72–75.

Source of support: Nil

Conflict of interest: None

INTRODUCTION

National security was viewed from the realist perspective until the end of the Cold War, which placed emphasis on the military capability of the nation. The same has been transformed by factors such as ideological debates, geopolitical situations, technological revolution, and changes in world order. Therefore, today, the concept of national security is being perceived from a comprehensive understanding that involves both traditional and nontraditional notions of the concept. In contemporary society, the role of the military sector is not restricted to the protection of the state from external factors. For nations like India that are facing myriad other internal challenges such as poverty, unemployment, insurgency, and external threats from neighboring countries, it becomes necessary to cope with the challenges by being self-reliant and self-sufficient in every aspect. Against this backdrop, this article explores whether the self-sufficient defense sector will help India tackle its overall national security. In order to fill in the research gap identified in this article, qualitative data was retrieved from secondary sources such as journals, newspaper articles, and books, examining some of the variables that were found appropriate for the study.

SECURITY THREATS TO INDIA

In the current geopolitical environment, national security deals with a country’s ability to defend itself against all threats. India confronts both internal and foreign obstacles requiring thorough thought. Security risks, both traditional and nontraditional, are causing the security dimensions to expand on their own and opening the door for dangers that are more modern in character.1 India is a rapidly growing force in South Asia and one of the biggest democracies in the world, as is well known. Still, because of its geopolitical location, India’s national security and integrity are constantly threatened.2 Furthermore, a new order in modern international geopolitics evolved with the end of the Cold War. New geopolitics as concerned with India is centered around the border confrontation in the neighborhood, cross-border terrorism from Pakistan, the rise of China, the rising importance of the Indo-Pacific region, and the growing significance of science and technology. India has undoubtedly been affected by such changes.3 It is critical to balance the difficult strategic environment since India has two nuclear-armed neighbors who are quickly advancing their military capabilities. Owing to these factors, having absolute power was the only way to achieve security. It involves power in the areas of technology, society, economy, infrastructure, and politics.4

Given India’s extremely volatile neighborhood and conflicts in most countries, it seems that concern about hard security threats is more important than nontraditional or human security concerns.5 However, this has not been the case. While India invests in hard security, especially in the modernization of its defense systems, it invests much more in dealing with its human security challenges, especially poverty reduction at home, generating employment, and boosting private sectors. Additionally, compared to just hard security concerns, its international performance demonstrates a higher engagement with human security activities. Thus, it can be concluded that India balances its investment in meeting both traditional and nontraditional challenges with the aim of achieving comprehensive national security.6 In order to achieve it, India has been focusing on making the nation self-reliant in every aspect, especially in the defense sector, given its uncertain neighborhood.

INDIAS SELF-RELIANT DEFENSE INDUSTRY

Significant changes to the notion of national security over the years have been examined by many scholars and analysts.7 In the past, the nation-state was a primary object that needed to be secured. Thus, it was a referent object that embodied the idea of a state-centric society. According to the traditional framework, all other state entities are at risk if a nation is unable to guarantee its own life. In order to ensure state sovereignty, the main focus of conventional security is to build up one’s military strength. Thus, it is clear that the Realism school of thought had a significant impact on the traditional conception of national security.8 Realist strategists like Clausewitz, Machiavelli, and Sun Tzu have offered a variety of definitions of national security from realist views. However, due to global events like the two World Wars and the Cold War, traditional ideas of security have been questioned by many liberal scholars who believe that the state should take precedence over individuals who are unaware that the state itself may be a source of threats, and believe that military power is the only means of waging war.9 Therefore, the focus on external military threats to national security was evident until the end of the Cold War. Since the conclusion of the Cold War, the traditional concept has been rethought and reconceptualized on the basis of these and has been impacted by other variables. The idea of national security has been expanded, as Barry Buzan and Hansen point out in their book, by including the social, economic, political, and environmental sectors in addition to the military sector, which are also interconnected. A specific referent item and threat are identified for each sector.10 Today, a state’s capacity is determined by its ability to protect its population through all-encompassing security measures, as well as its territorial sovereignty and integrity.

The defense sector of any nation is the common factor in both traditional and nontraditional concepts of security. Thus, the self-reliant defense sector of a nation plays a huge role in addressing threats emanating from external as well as internal factors.11 In such a scenario, India is not an exception. Kalam, in 2006, stated, “National security is born out of two important components. One is economic growth and prosperity; second is the capability to defend the nation against all types of threats.”12 Accordingly, the defense industry of India is appropriate to cater to both the components of national security.

In the context of India, the idea of self-reliance is not new. It dates back to the early years of India’s independence and has been profoundly impacted by a variety of variables, including leadership, global and local events, the economy, and others.13 It is indisputable that India’s struggle with a failing economy, poverty, resource scarcity, historical legacies, and sectarian strife dates back to the country’s independence.14 During the early stages of independence, the idealist Nehru government placed a strong emphasis on the socioeconomic advancement of the country as the ultimate answer to all of India’s issues. This is regarded the leading advocate for global peace and disarmament, which has imposed limitations on military spending.15 The difficulties India encountered when emphasizing world peace. India faced threats from its neighbors and got engaged in wars with China and Pakistan, as well as the ominous setback India suffered at the hands of China in 1962. India was simultaneously forced by the fallout from the 1962 conflict to concentrate on building a strong defense industrial base and a capable standing army. Although India held research institutions like the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), which was founded in 1958, and developed defense manufacturing policies and ordnance factory boards before the defeat.16 India was then more focused on the socioeconomic development of the country. Following the 1962 war, India began carefully preparing for defense through the 1964 5-year plan, although lack of funding posed significant obstacles to its execution.17

The cordial ties established by Indira Gandhi established with the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) shortly after succeeding Nehru as Prime Minister of India demonstrated the futility of the nonalignment campaign. After that, India turned to the USSR for defense supplies, which helped strengthen India’s defense during the 1971 Liberation War. Indira Gandhi is also credited with enhancing India’s technological defense capabilities as a preventative step. From the 1980s on, Indira Gandhi concentrated on advancing the concept of modernizing India’s military in order to attain national security.18 Rajiv Gandhi significantly aided Indira Gandhi’s efforts to modernize the defense by modernizing India through the industrial revolution. Rajiv Gandhi signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) for the transfer of technology while visiting the United States in 1985 and 1987. The Rajiv Gandhi administration is renowned for making some cutting-edge defense purchases. Among them are the fighter jets Mirage 2000 (France), Bofors (Sweden), and AN-32 (Soviet). Apart from importing, India placed a significant priority on developing its own missiles, such as the Trishul, Prithvi, and Agni, that were introduced in 1988–1989. Additionally, Rajiv Gandhi quadrupled the budgetary allotment for the defense industry. Therefore, it is clear from all of these policies that India’s indigenous defense program placed a strong emphasis on the country’s traditional security.19

The 1990s economic liberalization and change in the global order have shifted attention to the nation’s nonmilitary sectors.16 Despite significant investments in the indigenization of the defense sector, India continues to lag behind in terms of indigenous acquisition due to a number of factors, including a lack of funding, a lack of technological know-how, and research institute monopolies. In the list of countries that buy arms globally, India tops Saudi Arabia, according to reports published by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) (2022).17 India is spending a sizable portion of its gross domestic product (GDP) on defense purchases, but it also faces numerous external dangers, including border disputes, particularly with China and Pakistan.20

India faces a variety of internal and external dangers, including poverty, unemployment, a lack of technological know-how, and ethnic conflict. According to the most recent statistics, 14.96% of Indians struggle with poverty.21 After dropping by 10.3% during the epidemic, the unemployment issue has gotten worse, and tensions along the northern border were at their height.22 The Government of India has always been interested in finding a solution to both conventional and nonconventional dangers to the country while analyzing such scenarios. Since gaining its independence, India has used one of its main policies, self-reliance, to address the country’s numerous challenges.

As a result, during the current administration’s tenure, signature initiatives like Make in India and, more recently, Aatma Nirbhar Bharat have been touted as ways to make India self-sufficient. Therefore, it may be concluded that in a realistic world, realist security concepts actually dominate international affairs. India has been significantly reliant on foreign suppliers for military supplies and equipment because it is a developing nation with ongoing border conflicts and geopolitical issues. India’s efforts to develop military proficiency through indigenization programs have been hampered by a number of issues, most notably the politics of global hegemony, which strongly depends on technological superiority.23 With the campaign slogan of Aatma Nirbhar Bharat, a phrase coined by the current prime minister, India aims to achieve huge financial leaps with the use of extremely sophisticated infrastructure that represents modern India and with a focus on technologically driven systems to provide employment for the enormous population and meet the needs of the country. The following areas are where the government plans to encourage increased self-reliance within the defense sector:

CONCLUSION

The concept of national security has transformed drastically from traditional to nontraditional and comprehensive in contemporary society, having been influenced by factors such as global world order, ideologies, and others. Accordingly, the defense sector, which was viewed as a protector of the state from external threats, is now perceived as a facilitator in achieving nontraditional security. Thus, India’s defense sector has a huge potential to address numerous challenges such as unemployment, poverty, and technological innovation through schemes for self-reliance such as “Make in India” and “Aatma Nirbhar Bharat Abhiyan.” Myriad initiatives have been taken up by the Government of India through the indigenization of the defense sector, such as recruitment in armed forces for the production and manufacturing of equipment within the nation, cutting down on imports of goods from foreign nations so as to boost the manufacturing sector of India since the announcement of “Aatma Nirbhar Abhiyan” Government of India has touted the progress of the country and has been successful in achieving its goals to some extent.

REFERENCES

1. Panwar R, Chauhan B. India’s Security Challenges in the 21st century. J Indian Art History Congress 2022;28;1.

2. Muraviev AD, Ahlawat D, Hughes L. India’s security dilemma: engaging big powers while retaining strategic autonomy. Int Polit 2022;59:1119–1138. DOI: 10.1057/s41311-021-00350-z

3. Bhalla M. India’s Approach to Asia: Strategy, Geopolitics and Responsibility. Pentagon Press; 2016.

4. Jaishankar D. India rising: Soft power and the world’s largest democracy. Brookings. 2018.

5. Kumar Y. India’s policy towards its extended neighbourhood and the larger context of national foreign policy challenges. Ministry of External Affairs India 2016.

6. Kumar R. India’s potential role in a new global security consensus. Global Security in a multipolar world. 2009;49–66.

7. Baldwin D. Review of International Studies. 1997. pp. 5–26.

8. Cresswell M. Was Clausewitz Realist? If So, What Kind? E-International Relations 2019.

9. White, J. (25th July, 2018). How has the study of International Security changed since the Cold War’s end? E-International Relations

10. Rahman AAA. The concept of National Security in the period of cold war and post-cold war. J Law Sustain Develop 2023;11(5):1–9. DOI: 10.55908/sdgs.v11i5.766

11. Nagial BS. Atmanirbhar Bharat and self-reliance in defence. TOI 2022.

12. Kakkar H. Evolving Concepts of National Security. The Statesman. 2021.

13. Pattanaik SS. India’s neighbourhood policy: perceptions from Bangladesh. Strategic Analysis 2011;35(1):71–87. DOI: 10.1080/09700161.2011.530985

14. Dogra R. India’s World: How Prime Ministers Shaped Foreign Policy. Rupa Publications; 2019.

15. Clary C. Personalities, organizations and doctrine in the Indian military. Indian Review 2017;17(1):100–121. DOI: 10.1080/14736489.2018.1415283

16. Hilali AZ. India’s strategic thinking and its national security policy. Asian Survey 2011;41(5):737–764. DOI: 10.1525/as.2001.41.5.737

17. Behera LK. Indian Defence Industry: An Agenda for Making in India. Institute for Defence Studies & Analyses. 2016.

18. Kapur A. Indian Security and Defence Policies under Indira Gandhi. J Asian African Stud 1987;22(3):176–193. DOI: 10.1163/156852187X00368

19. Thakur R. How Rajiv Gandhi reset India’s relationship with the west: Ravni Thakur. The Week. 2021.

20. Behera LK. Examining India’s Interim Defence Budget 2024-25. Observer Research Foundation. 2024.

21. Go I. India: National Multidimensional Poverty Index A Progress Review 2023. NITI Aayog. 2023.

22. Kumar O, Srivastava S. (17th September, 2021). Impact of Covid-19 on employment in urban areas. PRS Legislative Research.

23. Jaishankar D. The Indigenisation of India’s Defence Industry. Brookings. 2019.

24. Singh D. India’s Unity and Security: Challenges. Patriot. 1985.

________________________
© The Author(s). 2024 Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.